Romania’s Obama

In 2008, America elected Barack Hussein Obama, a racial minority, President. African-Americans make up 13% of America’s population.

In 2014, Romania elected Klaus Werner Iohannis, an ethnic German, President. Romanians of German descent make up less than 1% of Romania’s population.

I asked my two classes of American Studies students if they thought the election in 2014 and re-election in 2019 of Iohannis marked as big a leap forward in Romania as Obama’s 2008 and 2012 victories symbolized for millions of Americans, including me. They nodded yes in unison and several talked about how Iohannis’ German ancestry was used against him, especially in the election of 2014.

President Iohannis is the first ethnic minority to be elected President of Romania. Iohannis is also a protestant (a member of the German-speaking Lutheran Church) in a country that is 80% Eastern Orthodox. As I was thinking about how I am connected to two countries that broke with tradition in exceptional ways, I remembered the Luther College Alumni tour to Ireland and Northern Ireland Rebecca and I led last fall. And another tradition-breaking politician popped into my head.

In 2017, Ireland’s first gay Taoiseach (Prime Minister), Leo Varadkar, assumed office. Varadkar’s Hindu father was born in India, Catholic mother in Ireland where Varadkar was raised a Catholic.

I have lived or traveled in three countries this past year, with each collectively deciding to break with the past in ways I consider signs of progress. Race in America, ethnic identity in Romania, and sexual orientation in Ireland are no longer insurmountable obstacles to rising to the top of politics and other professions in each country. This is a better world in so many ways than the world I was born into in 1949. Some things that were considered impossible have now become reality. Racism, ethnocentrism, and homophobia are still with us, but with less-lasting force and mostly in defensive, backs-against-the-wall postures.

Of course, not everyone thinks the Obama, Iohannis and Varadkar stories are good news stories. What some call progress never comes without a struggle and there is always the possibility of backlash. That is the central argument of Michelle Alexander’s The New Jim Crow. She writes about how when slavery, America’s first racial caste system, ends in 1865 it is followed two decades later by the imposition of Jim Crow laws across the American south. When the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 end Jim Crow, America declares a war on drugs, a new ‘Jim Crow caste system’ that disproportionately incarcerates African Americans.

Is the election of Donald Trump in 2016 another form of backlash against the two terms of America’s first African-American president? What do you think? It is a question my Romanian students and I will talk about in our next on-line class session. There is no simple answer and I am interested in what you think.

Reader Comments

  1. Mike Cardinal

    It’s a backlash, but nothing to do with race. Voters of all kinds think it is in their best interest to support a govt that puts Americans first. Pretty simple actually. A lot of it has to do with economics.
    – Jobs moving overseas
    – Big corporations going global
    – The perception that uncontrolled immigration threatens jobs

    Obama’s view was transnational. Trump’s is American centric.

    • Paul

      Thanks Mike; I like your three points and the America first is powerful, as is your point about Obama as a trans-nationalist and Trump’s America-centric.

  2. Dale A raddatz

    Race played only a small part in it. Trump is a result of many Americans being overlooked by the government during the last 40 years or more. his election was a backlash against those in power as well as the more educated in American society whom they believe take care of themselves and have looked down on everyone else. Though many Trump supporters liked the idea of America first, and rigid border control, “build the wall!”, others simply wanted to tell the US government elites to F*#k off. Trump was the vehicle to do that. He was so outside the norm he became a breath of fresh in a room full of useless politicians. I have to say that many of his supporters represented a large part of the US population that has little or no higher education. This divide has always been a rift in America and it blew up in 2016. It may well blow up again in 2020 considering the turmoil that currently exists with the DNC candidate. I am not holding my breath but Trump may be a reality for 4 more torturous years ahead.

    • Paul

      Thanks Jack; I think a good summary; lots of this kind of push back against mainstream in Eastern Europe, especially Hungary and Poland. Not so much Romania yet. It could be because Romania has lost so many young people to other countries. Many of the young people we talk with are quite discouraged about their government.

  3. Craig Knutson

    I would agree with Mike that the three points he lists are the reasons many Trump supporters support him but also feel some are drawn to him as a reaction to having an African American president. In addition I wish people would learn from the past. In the 1930s the America First movement representing isolationists was discredited when Pearl Harbor was bombed. The coronavirus again shows that the US cannot be isolated from the rest of the world no matter how much some wish it to be

    • Paul

      Thanks Craig and good to hear from you. Lots to talk about since Ireland. Learn from the past, yes. Why we can’t? Some do. Human nature makes that learning or re-learning necessary with each generation. Maybe this really bad thing will remind us that isolation is not possible even if it is desired.

Comments are closed.